Dispassionate observers were
surprised at the level of vociferous negativism associated with
the A380's design and development. Fortunately, none of
the criticisms have been shown to be fair, and the plane redeems
itself in every respect - for airlines, as a fuel efficient way
of transporting larger numbers of passengers in a single
movement, and for passengers, as a more comfortable and relaxing
way of traveling.
With 17 customers, 202 orders,
and a growing number of planes now 'in the air' and earning
positive reviews, the future success of the A380 seems
increasingly assured.
Indeed, not content to rest on
their laurels, Airbus is already moving forward with an even
larger A380, being 21' longer and capable of holding about 100
extra passengers.
Controversy over the A380
The A380 has attracted a
great deal of criticism and controversy, most of it sadly
ill-informed.
A380 is very fuel efficient
Some environmentalists, who
are opposed for unclear and not always valid reasons to any and
all aviation, attacked the A380 purely because it may encourage
more people to travel. The flip side of this complaint
however underscores its weakness - the reason more people would
be encouraged to travel is because of the greater efficiencies
and lower operating costs of the A380, and in particular its
improved fuel economy, which allows for something in the order
of 80 or more passenger miles per gallon of jet fuel burned.
For one or two people (or even three) traveling together,
they'll use less fuel traveling by A380 than driving their
personal car.
A380 is very quiet
It is also interesting to
note that although the A380 is a huge plane with very powerful
engines, it is also a much quieter aircraft than the 747, not
only inside the passenger cabin, but for people outside as well.
The reduced noise 'pollution' from the A380 - it is only half as
loud as a 747 when taking off and landing - is certainly
something that should be welcomed by people living/working close
to airports.
Is there a need for the A380
Perhaps the most ridiculous
negative attacks have been from industry observers saying that
there is no need for this type of plane. Airbus had sold
189 of the planes before the first A380 was delivered to
Singapore Airlines on 15 October 2007, and currently (Aug 2008)
has sold 202 A380s, an achievement which one would think
effectively rebuts this claim. Indeed, one of the loudest
critics of the A380 - Boeing - has now reversed its own position
by developing a larger version of its 747 to try and compete
with the A380, at least in some parts of the very large plane
market.
Would the A380 overload
airports
One of the more persistent
and ill-founded lines of criticism has been that the plane is
'too big' and that airports won't have the infrastructure to
handle such a huge group of passengers all arriving or departing
at the same time.
This is wrong in two main
ways.
Firstly, the A380s delivered
to date have between 450 and 490 seats on them. This is
only 50 - 100 more seats than on a 747-400 (which typically has
up to 416 seats in a three class configuration), and unless the
plane is full, means less than 50 - 100 more passengers.
This is not a huge number of
extra passengers. Surely any airport that can handle a 416
passenger flight can handle a 490 passenger flight without any
significant problem.
Secondly, any airport that
the A380 is likely to fly to is, by definition, a major hub
airport, and it is designed not just for one flight at a time,
but for tens or even hundreds of flights all to be processed
through the airport simultaneously. Consider an airport
that has 30 planes arriving every hour at present, with perhaps
an average of 250 passengers per flight, and let's say this
airport now changes three of those arriving flights from 747s to
A380s.
This means the airport,
already having 7500 passengers an hour to process, now has to
handle an extra 250 or so passengers - a 3% increase in numbers.
That is a trivial rather than an important change, and any major
airport should be able to handle this with no problems at all.
Lastly, in response to this
concern, look at the airports that are already handling the
A380. London, Sydney, Singapore, JFK, Dubai, and soon to
be Los Angeles and Melbourne too. Are they having problems
with managing the A380? No, not at all.
Are the planes 'too big' for
passenger comfort
Some people, who have never
seen an A380, delight in saying 'I'd refuse to fly on a plane
with 550 other people. It would be way too cramped and
crowded for me.'
This statement too reveals a
misunderstanding of the A380. Although it can indeed carry
a lot of people (but no A380s yet carry more than 490 seats)
there is an even larger increase in space. In terms of
square feet of space per passenger, you have much greater space
on an A380 than you do on other planes.
Because there are two floors
inside the plane, you're never confronted with all your fellow
passengers, and with the cabin divided into sections, you never
have a huge expanse of people crowding in on you.
And when it comes to
boarding and departing an A380, if you're at an airport with the
three jetways the A380 recommends, you're averaging
about 160 passengers per each of the three jetways. That
should make getting off the plane faster than even getting off a
small 737 (with more than 160 passengers and one jetway) and
profoundly better than just about every other plane, which only
very rarely has more than one jetway in service.
In actual fact, in terms of
traveling with a large group of fellow travelers, you're less
aware of doing this on an A380 than any other medium or large
sized plane.
How about A380 safety
There's another group of
gloomy opponents of the A380 who mutter darkly about 'just
imagine the disaster when one of these crashes and we have 500+
fatalities'. Even this comment can be rebutted - a bigger
plane doesn't mean more overall deaths - the extra deaths if a
plane does crash are balanced by fewer flights to carry the same
number of people, and so the average expected level of
fatalities stays the same.
Oh - and do remember that air
travel remains the safest method of transportation known to
mankind, and also remember the not commonly appreciated fact
that most airplane crashes do not result in appreciable
fatalities.
The A380 and Airports
The good news is that an
A380, as big and heavy as it is, doesn't need any extra runway
to take-off or land on than does a 747, and will operate on a
typical 150ft wide runway, the same as smaller planes.
Although the A380 is very
much heavier than a 747, it doesn't require any strengthening of
runways or taxiways, because it has four extra wheels which
spread its weight evenly, reducing stress on the underlying
surface. But any taxiway or runway bridge type structures
may need strengthening to support the plane's greater total
weight.
However, taxiways may need
widening to ensure that the outboard engines of the A380 are
above sealed surface, reducing the likelihood of them ingesting
whatever might be otherwise lying on grass surfaces and damaging
the engines. And taxiways also may need increased lane
width and separation due to the A380's 50' greater wingspan.
When the A380 pulls into a
gate, it ideally wants to have three jetways to speed the
loading and unloading of passengers, and may need extra space
between its gate and adjacent gates (again because of its
greater wingspan).
Other issues involve things
such as getting service vehicles that can reach the greater
height of the A380's top deck, and having ground tugs strong
enough to tow the A380.
By 2011, more than 70
airports will be ready for A380 operations. While that
might not sound like a lot, when you consider that - today - 80%
of all 747 flights are between just 37 different airports, and
looking to the future, it is expected that 70% of A380 flights
will be between 25 different airports, plainly the airport
resources needed to ensure the necessary deployment of A380s are
being arranged.
One problem that has yet to
be resolved is an International Civil Aviation Organization
ruling that requires increased separation between A380s and
other planes. This means that there has to be a longer
delay between an A380 landing or taking off at an airport and
another plane following it, and at an airport with an already
maxed out schedule of take-offs and landings, these extra delays
can run contrary to all the other benefits of using the larger
capacity A380.
This increase in separation
time may be due to an abundance of caution and concern about the
possibility of the larger airplane generating extra wake
turbulence. However, the plane's efficient aerodynamic
design minimizes rather than aggravates wake turbulence, and
Airbus hopes to get the initial cautious ratings revised back to
the same as apply to 747s and other large sized jets. Such
a revision will take time to be ratified and is not expected to
take effect until some time in 2009.
Comparative Facts and Figures
To put the planes into
perspective, here is a table showing relevant aspects of the
current biggest/best 747 (the 747-400ER), the A380, and the new
747-8 (not yet in production).

Not a very good picture, but
the best I could manage - this shows the A380 (on the left) with
a 747 alongside it on the right, to show you sort of the respect
size of the two planes. Yes, the A380 is clearly much
bigger - a taller tail, a much bigger fuselage, and (not
apparent here) enormously bigger wings, but the difference is
size isn't as starkly apparent as between, say, a 747 and a 777.
Lengthwise, it is not
dissimilar to a 747, and it typically has a capacity for only
about 100 more passengers than a current version 747 - about a
25% increase. Interestingly, although passenger numbers
are about 25% up on a 747, cabin floor space is 50% greater,
giving a much more spacious and less crowded feel to the plane.
|
747-400ER |
A380 |
747-8 |
Length |
232 ft |
240 ft |
251 ft |
Wingspan |
211 ft |
262 ft |
225 ft |
Tail
Height |
63' 8" |
79' 1" |
63' 6" |
Empty
Weight |
406,900 lbs |
610,200 lbs |
410,000 lbs |
Max
Takeoff Weight |
910,000 lbs |
1,235,000
lbs |
970,000 lbs |
Range
(miles) |
8880 |
9440 |
9260 |
Cruising
speed |
Mach 0.855
570 mph |
Mach 0.85
560 mph |
Mach 0.855
570 mph |
Passenger
capacity
(3 class) |
up to 416 |
up to 538 |
up to 467 |
Passenger
capacity
(2 class) |
up to 524 |
up to 644 |
|
Cabin
Width |
20' main
deck |
21' 7" main
deck
19' 5" upper deck |
20' 1" main
deck |
|
What You Won't Find in an A380
In a situation that eerily
reflects the evolution of the 747 cabin layout (which started
off with piano bars and lounges), initial hype over the larger
A380 cabin had various airline executives and industry
commentators predicting nonsensically fanciful uses of the
A380's cabin space.
Among the various things
proposed for the A380 cabin were :
-
Beauty Salons
-
Gymnasiums
-
Shopping Arcades
-
Meeting Rooms
-
Games Rooms and Casinos
-
Bars and Lounges
-
Restaurants
-
Separate sleeping areas
All of these ideas would
consume large amounts of space while generating very small
amounts of extra income per square foot of space, and the people
proposing such ideas never seemed to comprehend that most
airlines would rather use the available space by putting more
seats in and earning more money by carrying more passengers.
So, unsurprisingly, little
or nothing of these ideas have survived to the actual reality of
the plane layouts, with the most extravagant user of luxury
space to date being Emirates (two bar/lounges and two
shower/spas).
How many seats are there on an
A380?
Just like the situation with
the 747 (or any other plane), there are many different ways that
the 551 sq m (5931 sq ft) of cabin space on an A380 can be used
for passenger seating.
Airbus initially said that a
recommended/typical configuration for an A380 would be for 555
seats, split over three different classes (first, business and
economy). It subsequently reduced that number down to 525,
and at the same time used the weight saving to allow for an
increase in range of 230 miles.
The plane is certified to
hold up to 853 passengers, based on testing to determine how
many people can exit the plane in a simulated emergency, with
only half the emergency exits working, in less than 90 seconds.
The Airbus testing had 853 passengers and 20 crew exit the plane
in 78 seconds, and in complete darkness.
The following table lists
current seating arrangements announced by airlines with A380s.
Airline |
Total |
First |
Business |
Premium
Economy |
Economy |
Singapore |
471 |
12
1-2-1
lower |
60
1-2-1
upper |
0 |
399 on both
decks
3-4-3 on lower
2-4-2 on upper |
Emirates |
489 |
14
1-2-1
upper |
76
1-2-1
upper |
0 |
399
3-4-3
lower |
Emirates
Med range
(11 hr or less) |
517 |
? |
? |
0 |
? |
Emirates
Two Class |
604 |
0 |
? |
0 |
? |
Qantas |
450 |
14
1-1-1
lower |
72
2-2-2
upper |
32
2-3-3
upper |
332
3-4-3
lower |
Air
France |
538 |
9
1-2-1
lower |
80
2-2-2
upper |
0 |
106
2-4-2
upper
343
3-4-3
lower |
Air
Austral |
840 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
840 |
Lufthansa |
526 |
8
1-2-1
upper |
98
2-2-2
upper |
0 |
420
3-4-3
lower |
|
Major A380 Customers
Here's a list of all
airlines that have ordered A380s, as of 12 August 2008.
There has been only two
orders for less than five planes - one is for the 'Flying
Palace' plane ordered for Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal, the
billionaire investor dubbed the Saudi Arabian Warren Buffett;
and the other order for four is actually referred to as a
'commitment' rather than an order. It is from Grupo
Marsans, the largest tourism and transportation company in
Spain. It operates two airline brands - Aerolineas
Argentinas and Air Comet.
Note that the entry for ILFC
refers to the airplane leasing company; the actual airlines that
will be leasing these planes from ILFC are not yet known.
Airline |
Orders |
Air
France |
12 |
British
Airways |
12 |
China
Southern |
5 |
Emirates |
58 |
Etihad |
10 |
Grupo
Marsans |
4 |
ILFC |
10 |
Kingdom
Holding Company |
1 |
Kingfisher Airlines |
5 |
Korean
Airlines |
8 |
Lufthansa |
15 |
Malaysia
Airlines |
6 |
Qantas
Airways |
20 |
Qatar
Airways |
5 |
Singapore Airlines |
19 |
Thai
Airways |
6 |
Virgin
Atlantic |
6 |
|
Future Enhancements to the A380
The A380 has been designed
to allow for easy future enhancements and increase in size.
In particular, its massive wings can support a much greater
weight than the present model A380-800.
Airbus has already
announced, in November 2007, plans for a larger A380-900,
something that has been widely expected for some time prior to
the announcement. This would stretch the current 240'
fuselage to 261', making it the world's longest plane, and
increasing its seating capacity by about 100 passengers.
Development of this larger
model A380 is expected to start in 2010, with the first
commercial flights expected in 2015.
Many of the A380's biggest
customers such as Emirates and Singapore Airlines have already
expressed interest in this larger version A380.
There was also talk of a
smaller A380, designated possibly an A380-700. When the
plane was first known as an A3XX it was discussed in three
variations, with the A380-800 representing the midsize and the
A380-900 representing the larger size; the A380-700 would be the
third of these three variations.
Little has been heard of the
-700 version since it was first implied in the mid 1990s, and
probably the continued narrowing of the gap between the largest
other airplanes, and the filling of that small gap by the 747-8
has caused the -700 concept to be discontinued.
Part 3 of a four part
series on the Airbus A380 - please
also visit
1.
Airbus A380 antecedents
2.
Differing plans for a 747 successor
3.
A380 completion, configuration, and controversy
4.
Inside an Emirates A380
|
If so, please donate to keep the website free and fund the addition of more articles like this. Any help is most appreciated - simply click below to securely send a contribution through a credit card and Paypal.
|
Originally published
15 August 2008, last update
30 May 2021
You may freely reproduce or distribute this article for noncommercial purposes as long as you give credit to me as original writer.
|